Public-source research
Vendor evidence
Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.
Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details
Evidence records1280
Source checked863
Needs verification0
Source captured0
No supporting claim found411
Excluded from evidence6
Cisco AI Defense official materials reviewed did not provide a clear non-human identity or service-account lifecycle security claim.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Microsoft Purview AI protection materials reviewed did not provide a clear non-human identity or service-account lifecycle security claim.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Noma claims it supports identity and access controls for AI applications and agents as part of pre-deployment boundaries.
setting proper identity and access controls for every AI application and agent
Related framework references (5)
JetStream claims every AI workflow is tied to a provable owner by binding people, agents, NHIs, and model usage into an accountable identity fabric.
Every AI workflow is tied to a provable owner by binding people, agents, NHIs, and model usage into one accountable identity fabric. Raw model provider secrets are replaced with virtual, revocable keys scoped to the approved Blueprint design, so you can rotate, rate‑limit, or kill access without code changes.
Related framework references (5)
Netskope claims visibility into non-human activity for AI agent interactions through Model Context Protocol (MCP) traffic monitoring.
Monitor the MCP traffic that enables your AI agent interactions, giving visibility into non‑human activity and preventing unauthorized data access or risky connections.
Related framework references (5)
Singulr Agent Pulse claims auditable records of agent actions, data access, and policy enforcement, with controls based on agent type, tool access, and scope.
Agent Pulse provides auditable records of agent actions, data access, and policy enforcement
Related framework references (5)
Prompt Security from SentinelOne claims visibility into agents and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers plus least-privilege access enforcement for AI agents.
Enforce least-privilege access so agents operate only within their defined scope
Related framework references (5)
Cato AI Security claims it discovers and analyzes enterprise AI agent activity and monitors interactions between agents, models, and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.
monitor every interaction between agents, models, and MCP servers
Related framework references (5)
Oasis Security claims it secures AI agents and non-human identities across IaaS, software as a service (SaaS), PaaS, and on-prem environments.
Oasis secures AI agents and non-human identities across IaaS, SaaS, PaaS, and on-prem environments
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims visibility into non-human identities and over-permissioned tools as part of AI and software as a service (SaaS) exposure management.
Surface over-permissioned tools and non-human identities (NHIs)
Related framework references (5)
WitnessAI claims governance across human and AI-agent workforces, including visibility into agent tools and data access.
human and digital workforce
Related framework references (5)
Lasso Security claims AI agent inventory includes exposed actions and sensitive data reachability to support agent risk analysis.
what actions they can perform, what sensitive data can they reach
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Reco claims it makes agents, integrations, and non-human identities visible and maps what they can access.
Every day, your business deploys more agents, integrations, and non-human identities. Most of them operate invisibly. Reco makes them visible, maps what they can access, and tells you when they deviate from policy, before they become a liability.
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Zenity claims visibility into AI-agent ownership, permissions, integrations, access paths, and least-privilege posture.
ownership, permissions, integrations, and runtime behavior
Related framework references (5)
Nightfall claims detection of secrets, credentials, application programming interface (API) keys, and certificates in generative AI prompts and AI workflows.
credentials and secrets such as passwords or API keys
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Astrix Security claims it discovers, secures, and manages AI agents and NHIs and remediates excessive privileges and vulnerable configurations.
Identify and remediate AI agents and NHIs with excessive privileges, vulnerable configurations, abnormal activity, and policy violations.
Related framework references (5)