Public-source research
Vendor evidence
Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.
Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details
Evidence records1280
Source checked863
Needs verification0
Source captured0
No supporting claim found411
Excluded from evidence6
Cisco claims AI Defense discovers AI workloads, applications, models, data, and users across distributed cloud environments.
Discover the AI workloads, applications, models, data, and users across your distributed cloud environments.
Related framework references (5)
Microsoft claims supported AI app interactions can be monitored per user in the tenant and prompts and responses can flow into Purview activity views.
Interactions using supported AI apps can be monitored for each user in your tenant.
Related framework references (5)
JetStream claims it lets organizations see every AI action, tie actions to accountable owners, and keep workflows within approved boundaries.
See every AI action, tie actions to accountable owners, keep workflows inside approved boundaries, and turn AI from a black box into a managed system.
Related framework references (5)
Netskope claims generative AI App Security provides visibility across personal, corporate, approved, and shadow generative AI usage.
Gain complete visibility and enforce policies across your entire genAI footprint: personal to corporate, sanctioned to shadow.
Related framework references (5)
Singulr claims user activity and data-flow mapping across AI interactions to support visibility into how AI is used.
User activity and data flow mapping
Related framework references (5)
SentinelOne Prompt Security claims integration with AI code assistants such as GitHub Copilot and Claude Code for secure AI usage policy enforcement in development environments.
Yes. Prompt Security integrates with AI code assistants like GitHub Copilot and Claude Code to prevent secrets, credentials, and proprietary code from leaking into prompts, while enforcing secure AI usage policies across development environments.
Related framework references (5)
AIM Security (Cato) claims it gives full visibility and control into which generative AI apps are used and what data is shared with the AI models.
full visibility and control into what GenAI apps are used, and what data is shared with the AI models
Related framework references (5)
Oasis Security claims visibility and control across AI platforms, including agent, identity, and permission mapping.
Know exactly what's happening across all your AI platforms, with complete visibility and control.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims near-real-time visibility into AI tools, agents, and software as a service (SaaS) apps mapped to identities and data.
Visibility A near real-time view of every AI tool, agent, and SaaS app in use, mapped to the identities and data they touch.
Related framework references (5)
WitnessAI claims it visualizes AI conversations including prompts and responses in real time.
Visualize all AI conversations, including prompts and responses, in real time
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Harmonic claims it understands intent behind AI interactions across approved tools, shadow apps, and employee-created agents and governs those interactions in real time.
AI is everywhere your employees work: in approved tools, shadow apps, and the agents they're spinning up on their own. Harmonic Security sits at that layer, understands the intent behind every interaction, and governs it in real time.
Related framework references (5)
Reco claims AI security posture visibility across approved AI agents, software as a service (SaaS) applications, users, permissions, and data access.
Visibility and control over every agent from day one.
Related framework references (5)
Lakera claims employee AI usage includes approved and unapproved tools across browser, desktop, and software as a service (SaaS).
Teams are using sanctioned and unsanctioned AI tools across the browser, desktop, and SaaS.
Related framework references (5)
Zenity claims full-stack observability for approved and shadow AI, including inventory, owners, prompts, actions, and runtime activity.
Know which agents exist, who owns them, what they can access, and how they behave across your environment.
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
LayerX claims Chrome Enterprise integration for risk scoring and AI usage security across Chrome, Gemini, and Google Workspace environments.
LayerX directly integrates into the Chrome Enterprise management console to provide risk scoring and AI usage security for Chrome, Gemini and Google Workspace environments.
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)