ASAI Security ResearchIndependent public-source research
Public reviewread only

Public-source research

Vendor evidence

Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.

Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details
Evidence records1280
Source checked863
Needs verification0
Source captured0
No supporting claim found411
Excluded from evidence6

Showing 181–200 of 411 evidence records

Clear all filters
Entro Security · Security requirement

AI model and supply-chain security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Entro agent and non-human identity (NHI) security materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, model dependency analysis, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.

Aembit · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Aembit identity and access management (IAM) for Agentic AI materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Aembit · Security requirement

AI model and supply-chain security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Aembit identity and access management (IAM) for Agentic AI materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, dependency or Model Context Protocol (MCP) component analysis, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.

Aembit · Security requirement

AI coding-agent and workstation security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Aembit identity and access management (IAM) for Agentic AI materials reviewed did not establish governance of coding-agent commands, developer-workstation files or networks, integrated development environment (IDE) extensions, skills, hooks, secrets, or package actions.

Harmonic Security · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Harmonic platform materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Harmonic Security · Security requirement

AI model and supply-chain security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Harmonic platform materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, dependency analysis, Model Context Protocol (MCP) component risk scoring, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.

Cyberhaven · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Cyberhaven AI Security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Nightfall AI · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Nightfall Model Context Protocol (MCP) and agent security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Island Enterprise Browser · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Island AI Services materials reviewed did not provide a public customer-facing product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Island Enterprise Browser · Security requirement

AI model and supply-chain security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Island AI Services materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, dependency or Model Context Protocol (MCP) component analysis, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.

LayerX Security · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

LayerX Interaction Security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

LayerX Security · Security requirement

AI model and supply-chain security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

LayerX Interaction Security materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, dependency or Model Context Protocol (MCP) component analysis, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.

Apex Security / Tenable · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Tenable AI Exposure and AI-SPM materials reviewed did not provide a public customer-facing product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Knostic · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Knostic and AgentMesh materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing of customer models or agents, repeatable attack suites, or release-gate red teaming.

Onyx AI · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Onyx AI materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Onyx AI · Security requirement

AI model and supply-chain security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Onyx AI materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, dependency or Model Context Protocol (MCP) component analysis, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.

Onyx AI · Security requirement

AI coding-agent and workstation security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Onyx AI materials reviewed did not establish governance of coding-agent commands, developer-workstation files or networks, integrated development environment (IDE) extensions, skills, hooks, secrets, or package actions.

AIM Security / Cato Networks · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Cato AI Security and AIM materials reviewed did not provide a public customer-facing product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

JetStream Security · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

JetStream SAIG materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Grip Security · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Grip AI and software as a service (SaaS) security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.