Vendor evidence

Grip AI and software as a service (SaaS) security materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, dependency or Model Context Protocol (MCP) component analysis, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.

Reco AI agent and Model Context Protocol (MCP) security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Zenity platform materials reviewed did not provide a public customer-facing product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Token Security product materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Token Security product materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, dependency or Model Context Protocol (MCP) component analysis, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.

Iterate.ai AgentWatch and AgentOne materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.

Tenable AI Exposure and AI-SPM materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Operant AI platform materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Prisma AIRS materials reviewed did not establish customer AI workload cost attribution, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

SentinelOne Prompt Security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Singulr platform materials reviewed did not establish AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Zscaler AI Security materials reviewed did not establish customer AI workload cost attribution, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Noma Security platform materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Zenity platform materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Cato AI Security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Grip Security materials reviewed did not establish product-level AI cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Reco materials reviewed did not establish product-level AI cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Cisco AI Defense materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Lakera Workforce AI Security and Guard materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.

Lasso Security platform materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for AI usage-cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.