ASAI Security ResearchIndependent public-source research
Public reviewread only

Public-source research

Vendor evidence

Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.

Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details
Evidence records1280
Source checked863
Needs verification0
Source captured0
No supporting claim found411
Excluded from evidence6

Showing 361–380 of 411 evidence records

Clear all filters
Mindgard · Security requirement

Non-human identity and service-account security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Mindgard materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for workload identities, service accounts, application programming interface (API)-key discovery, secret rotation, or machine-credential lifecycle management.

Mindgard · Security requirement

AI agent identity and permissions

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Mindgard materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for agent registration, delegated authorization, short-lived credential issuance, or agent identity lifecycle controls.

Mindgard · Security requirement

AI coding-agent and workstation security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Mindgard materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for enforcing coding-agent commands, filesystem or network actions, skills, hooks, extensions, packages, or workstation activity.

Enkrypt AI · Security requirement

AI-feature discovery in business applications

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Enkrypt AI materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for tenant-level discovery of embedded AI features across enterprise software as a service (SaaS) applications.

Enkrypt AI · Security requirement

Controls for unapproved AI use

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Enkrypt AI materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for workforce allow, coach, restrict, or block policy over unapproved AI application use.

Enkrypt AI · Security requirement

Browser and business-application controls

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Enkrypt AI materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for browser session controls over upload, download, copy, paste, sharing, or form submission.

Enkrypt AI · Security requirement

Non-human identity and service-account security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Enkrypt AI materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for generic workload identities, service accounts, application programming interface (API)-key discovery, secret rotation, or machine-credential lifecycle management.

Akto · Security requirement

AI-feature discovery in business applications

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Akto materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for tenant-level inventory of embedded AI features across enterprise software as a service (SaaS) applications.

Akto · Security requirement

Non-human identity and service-account security

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Akto materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for generic service-account discovery, application programming interface (API)-key lifecycle, secret rotation, or machine-credential governance.

Okta for AI Agents · Security requirement

AI-feature discovery in business applications

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Okta materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for tenant-level inventory of embedded AI features across enterprise software as a service (SaaS) applications.

Okta for AI Agents · Security requirement

Browser and business-application controls

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Okta materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for browser session controls over AI upload, download, copy, paste, sharing, or form submission.

Okta for AI Agents · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

Okta materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for adversarial AI testing, red teaming, model evaluation, or release-gate regression testing.

CyberArk Secure AI Agents · Security requirement

Browser and business-application controls

No supporting claim found
Research finding

CyberArk materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for browser session controls over AI upload, download, copy, paste, sharing, or form submission.

CyberArk Secure AI Agents · Security requirement

AI assurance and adversarial testing

No supporting claim found
Research finding

CyberArk materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for adversarial AI testing, red teaming, evaluation, or regression release gates.