Public-source research
Vendor evidence
Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.
Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details
Evidence records1280
Source checked863
Needs verification0
Source captured0
No supporting claim found411
Excluded from evidence6
Grip claims centralized discovery and governance for AI applications, tenants, users, agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, prompts, activity, application programming interface (API) keys, integrations, permissions, posture, policy violations, remediation, and compliance workflows.
Transforms that data into actionable insights across discovery, posture management, AI governance, and threat detection.
Related framework references (5)
Grip AI and software as a service (SaaS) security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Grip AI and software as a service (SaaS) security materials reviewed did not establish model artifact scanning, provenance, signing, dependency or Model Context Protocol (MCP) component analysis, tamper detection, or model-registry release controls.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Grip claims AI-specific threat detection for suspicious activity, policy violations, credential abuse, and unauthorized agent behavior with operational remediation workflows across software as a service (SaaS) and Claude environments.
AI-specific threat detection helps identify suspicious activity, policy violations, credential abuse, and unauthorized agent behavior.
Related framework references (5)
Grip claims discovery and posture analysis for AI agents as non-human identities, including permissions, authentication, OAuth grants, application programming interface (API) keys, service accounts, access scopes, machine identities, and connected applications.
Security teams need visibility into AI agents, permissions, OAuth grants, and machine identities operating across SaaS environments.
Related framework references (5)
Grip claims visibility into Claude desktop, browser, agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, prompts, application programming interface (API) keys, connected tools, and developer workflows that generate code and automate tasks.
Visibility into desktop installations, browser based activity, connected MCP servers, AI agents, administrative API keys, and other non human identities.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security materials reviewed did not establish product-level AI cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims it builds an app inventory, links assets to identities, and helps teams find, trace, contain, and explain AI exposure or risk.
Grip builds an app inventory and links assets to identities. It is the technical backbone for AI governance so you can find, trace, contain, and explain any point of exposure or risk.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims it can see every AI and software as a service (SaaS) app outside SSO, tie it back to an employee, and automatically revoke access.
See every AI + SaaS outside SSO, tie it back to an employee, and automatically revoke access.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims near-real-time visibility into AI tools, agents, and software as a service (SaaS) apps mapped to identities and data.
Visibility A near real-time view of every AI tool, agent, and SaaS app in use, mapped to the identities and data they touch.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims it can identify unapproved AI and risky apps and trigger workflows or notifications for risky behavior.
Identify unsanctioned AI and risky apps immediately
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims visibility into AI tools, agents, and software as a service (SaaS) apps mapped to the identities and data they touch.
mapped to the identities and data they touch.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims visibility into AI tools, agents, software as a service (SaaS) apps, identities, and exposure points.
what those tools and agents are doing, where exposure and risk exists, and how to take action.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims visibility into agents, identities, and exposure points, adjacent to agent-to-agent security.
See every agent, identity and exposure point.
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims visibility into non-human identities and over-permissioned tools as part of AI and software as a service (SaaS) exposure management.
Surface over-permissioned tools and non-human identities (NHIs)
Related framework references (5)
Grip Security claims it strengthens user security in near real-time and extends user security through a browser extension.
Strengthen user security in near real-time
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (2)
Grip Security claims visibility into every point of AI exposure, adjacent to an external AI rollout.
Get visibility into every point of AI exposure
Related framework references (5)