Public-source research

Vendor evidence

Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.

Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details

Evidence records1280

Source checked863

Needs verification0

Source captured0

No supporting claim found411

Excluded from evidence6

Search evidenceResearch statusVendorSecurity requirementRelated framework

Showing 1–19 of 19 evidence records

Clear all filters

Netskope AI SecurityAI governance, risk, and complianceSource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Netskope claims unified AI governance using AI inventory, risk assessments, interaction logs, compliance mappings, policy controls, guardrails, and a single platform policy framework.

Log detailed session information, including initializations, tool requests, and responses, to provide the transparency required for AI governance.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAI assurance and adversarial testingSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims automated, scheduled adversarial simulations using more than 18,000 scenarios, multi-turn attacks, continuous risk tracking, and application programming interface (API)-based CI/CD release screening.

Automating adversarial simulations and integrating into CI/CD pipelines to help you uncover vulnerabilities.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAI model and supply-chain securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Netskope claims an Model Context Protocol (MCP) Catalog and inventory spanning local, containerized, remote, and code-repository Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers with risk assessment and access controls.

An inventory of publicly available MCP servers (remote and code repositories).

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAI gateway, tool-connection, and runtime controlsSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims an AI Gateway and Agentic Broker with real-time decoding, inspection, data loss prevention (DLP), guardrails, and granular blocking policies for prompts, responses, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, tools, and traffic.

Advanced real-time protection policy controls.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAI agent identity and permissionsSource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Netskope claims policy-based access control for autonomous non-human Model Context Protocol (MCP) interactions and visibility across Model Context Protocol (MCP) clients, servers, tools, resources, and prompt requests.

Scale your autonomous AI, and secure autonomous, non-human interactions, with unified visibility and control of public MCP servers.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAI coding-agent and workstation securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Netskope claims real-time protection and data loss prevention (DLP) for Model Context Protocol (MCP) client applications including AI code editors and developer tools, with discovery and blocking of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, tools, resources, and requests.

Real-time protection when using MCP client applications including AI code editors, chat interfaces, and developer tools.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityLicensing modelSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope documents AI Gateway as a subscription licensed by gateway instances and monthly transaction allocations, with separate tenant entitlements and add-on packages for more gateways or transactions.

Each Subscription Unit entitles the Customer to one Gateway instance and a fixed allocation of Transactions per calendar month.

Related framework references (2)

Commercial Metadata CSA AI Controls Matrix

Netskope AI SecurityUnapproved AI use discoverySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims Netskope One AI Security provides visibility and controls across enterprise apps, private models, agents, and shadow AI.

Unified AI security for every interaction, from enterprise apps, private models, and agents, to shadow AI.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAI-feature discovery in business applicationsSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims it can see and secure generative AI software as a service (SaaS), privately hosted large language models (LLMs), AI-powered applications, and autonomous agents.

See and secure your AI ecosystem across generative AI SaaS, privately hosted LLMs, AI-powered applications, and autonomous agents.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityApproved AI usage monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims generative AI App Security provides visibility across personal, corporate, approved, and shadow generative AI usage.

Gain complete visibility and enforce policies across your entire genAI footprint: personal to corporate, sanctioned to shadow.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityControls for unapproved AI useSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims it can enforce policies across generative AI use and provide access controls for enterprise AI adoption.

Gain complete visibility and enforce policies across your entire genAI footprint: personal to corporate, sanctioned to shadow.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecuritySensitive-data protection for generative AISource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims it inspects and sanitizes AI prompts and responses in real time and protects sensitive data across AI apps.

Inspect and sanitize every prompt and response in real time, with a unified defense against AI threats, misuse, and data loss.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityBrowser and business-application controlsSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims cloud app controls for generative AI include real-time access, out-of-band data protection, and security posture management.

Secure the GenAI era with Netskope's proven cloud app controls, from real-time access and out-of-band data protection to security posture management.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityGenerative AI application securitySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims AI Gateway secures AI-powered applications as data risk shifts to autonomous app-to-large language model (LLM) application programming interface (API) calls.

As you build AI-powered applications, data risk shifts from human prompts to autonomous app-to-LLM API calls.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Netskope claims AI Command Center provides visibility across generative AI apps and autonomous agents.

Gain comprehensive visibility across your entire AI environment, from genAI apps to autonomous agents

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Netskope claims Agentic Broker secures autonomous non-human interactions and provides visibility and control for public Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.

Scale your autonomous AI, and secure autonomous, non-human interactions, with unified visibility and control of public MCP servers.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityNon-human identity and service-account securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Netskope claims visibility into non-human activity for AI agent interactions through Model Context Protocol (MCP) traffic monitoring.

Monitor the MCP traffic that enables your AI agent interactions, giving visibility into non‑human activity and preventing unauthorized data access or risky connections.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityAI cost and usage controlsNo supporting claim found

No public Netskope AI Security claim found for operational AI spend attribution, budget controls, rate-limit cost governance, or model-routing cost optimization.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

Commercial Metadata NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP Agentic AI Security Solutions Landscape

Netskope AI SecurityApproved AI platform contextSource checkedRelated public context only

Netskope positions AI Security inside Netskope One, so current Netskope SASE/SSE customers should evaluate incremental enablement, policy reuse, and license scope before adding a separate AI security control plane.

Here's your chance to experience the Netskope One single-cloud platform first-hand.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape