ASAI Security ResearchIndependent public-source research
Public reviewread only

Vendor research

Cequence AI Gateway

Review what this vendor says publicly, the security topics those statements may support, what remains unverified, and factual company context. This is not an assessment of product effectiveness or fit.

Company scale

Scaled
?ScaledA private provider with at least $100M in known funding or at least 250 employees.This is a company-scale signal, not a product-quality rating.

A descriptive band derived from retained public revenue, workforce, ownership, or funding signals.

Company scale is separate from product features, effectiveness, and suitability.
  • $100M known funding
  • Founded 2014
  • Employee scale not sourced
  • Private-company revenue and profitability not sourced

Company context

Private independent, venture-backed company; no acquisition or parent-company claim was found on the reviewed Cequence-controlled pages

Cequence says it protects more than 10B daily application programming interface (API) interactions and 4B user accounts; its April 2026 Agent Personas announcement cited more than 140 verified enterprise application integrations

Research coverageCounts describe available public research, not product quality.View details
Vendor statements
19 records
Source-checked records
11
Evaluation requirements
19 in this research model
Unresolved requirements
8

Company intelligence

Who is behind the product

Company facts provide evaluation context. Each signal is kept separate because tenure, workforce, funding, and hiring answer different questions.

Founded2014 on Cequence's current company page; some older Cequence-controlled materials state 2015
HeadquartersSanta Clara, California
OwnershipPrivate independent, venture-backed company; no acquisition or parent-company claim was found on the reviewed Cequence-controlled pages
EmployeesNot yet sourced
Capital and scaleIndependent company

Cequence Security

Known funding
$100M

Cequence reported more than $100M in total funding in 2023; its $60M Series C was led by Menlo Ventures with participation from ICON Ventures, Telstra Ventures, HarbourVest Partners, Shasta Ventures, Dell Technologies Capital, and T-Mobile Ventures

Operating scale
Cequence says it protects more than 10B daily API interactions and 4B user accounts; its April 2026 Agent Personas announcement cited more than 140 verified enterprise application integrations
Backing context
Cequence reported more than $100M in total funding in 2023; its $60M Series C was led by Menlo Ventures with participation from ICON Ventures, Telstra Ventures, HarbourVest Partners, Shasta Ventures, Dell Technologies Capital, and T-Mobile Ventures
Named investors

Prosperity7 Ventures · Dell Technologies Capital · HarbourVest Partners · ICON Ventures · Menlo Ventures · Shasta Ventures · Telstra Ventures · T-Mobile Ventures

Founders and leadership2 people listed
  • Ameya Talwalkar

    President, CEO, and Co-Founder

    Current role listed
  • Shreyans Mehta

    CTO and Co-Founder

    Current role listed
Operating signalsRead each signal separately

There is no combined company rating. The company-scale label uses stated size thresholds; product features and effectiveness require separate evidence.

Company tenure
2014 on Cequence's current company page; some older Cequence-controlled materials state 2015
Workforce scale
Not yet sourced
Hiring activity
Not displayed

A current count requires a retained, clickable source URL.

Open research questions
  • Current employee range is not yet supported by a public source.
Company sources and research limits4 linked public sources

Only company facts supported by retained public sources are shown. Missing values remain unknown, and company scale does not establish product effectiveness.

Company sourceCequence AI Gateway product pageCequence describes MCP and direct API proxying, trusted MCP and API registries, OAuth integration, agent identities and permissions, runtime guardrails, audit logging, sensitive-data controls, and AI discovery.Company sourceCequence Agent Personas announcementCequence announced general availability of Agent Personas on April 28, 2026, with infrastructure-level privilege scope down to individual tool calls.Company sourceCequence company pageCequence's current company page provides its founder history, Santa Clara address, leadership, investor list, and operating-scale statements.Company sourceCequence Prosperity7 investment announcementCequence announced a $60M Series C in December 2021, bringing total investment to $100M, and later reported more than $100M in total funding after an additional 2023 investment.

Solution areas

These areas describe how the vendor approaches enterprise AI security. They do not establish product quality or fit.

AI API and web application protectionCore product focusAI gateway and tool-connection controlsCore product focusAction-taking agent safeguardsCore product focusAgent identity and permissionsCore product focusAI application runtime protectionRelated coverageAI data protectionRelated coverage

Buyer context

  • Treat Cequence AI Gateway as an agentic security and governance product rooted in application programming interface (API) access, not as a generic application programming interface (API)-security record or an SSE control plane.
  • Public evidence is strongest for Model Context Protocol (MCP) and application programming interface (API) mediation, trusted endpoint registries, OAuth-based access, tool-scoped agent permissions, behavioral controls, auditability, and sensitive-data enforcement.
  • Confirm agent identity lifecycle depth during diligence: public pages establish agent-to-permission mapping, token lifecycle, tool-level scope, and containment, but do not establish a full generic non-human identity (NHI) inventory and credential-rotation program.

Related frameworks

Where public vendor statements relate to framework requirements

11 related frameworks · expand when needed
These links show related requirements for further review. They do not establish framework compliance or control implementation. Open the full framework crosswalk →
Current referenceCIS Critical Security Controls
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
11
References
58
Review related requirements →
Current referenceCSA AI Controls Matrix
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
14
References
71
Review related requirements →
Current referenceISO/IEC 42001
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
12
References
35
Review related requirements →
Current referenceMITRE ATLAS
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
12
References
71
Review related requirements →
Current referenceNIST AI RMF Playbook
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
13
References
39
Review related requirements →
Current referenceNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
12
References
39
Review related requirements →
Informative referenceOWASP Agentic AI Security Solutions Landscape
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
12
References
31
Review related requirements →
Informative referenceOWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
11
References
27
Review related requirements →
Current referenceOWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
13
References
31
Review related requirements →
Current referenceOWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications
Requirements with public support
10
Related requirements
13
References
25
Review related requirements →
Commercial Metadata
Requirements with public support
3
Related requirements
3
References
3
Review related requirements →

Evaluation questions

What to verify beyond public claims

These questions come from security requirements with some public support. Use them as starting points for demonstrations, documentation review, customer references, or a buyer-observed pilot.

  1. 01
    Approved AI usage monitoring

    Approved AI workspace activity appears with user, workspace or tenant, model or provider, and timestamp.

  2. 02
    Approved AI usage monitoring

    Prompt, model, or admin activity can be exported or correlated for the selected approved AI platform.

  3. 03
    Controls for unapproved AI use

    A policy blocks, coaches, redirects, or contains a test interaction with an unapproved AI destination.

  4. 04
    Controls for unapproved AI use

    The control event records policy reason, user, destination, action, and timestamp.

  5. 05
    Sensitive-data protection for generative AI

    Sensitive prompt, response, or file test data is detected and classified during an AI interaction.

  6. 06
    Sensitive-data protection for generative AI

    A policy redacts, blocks, coaches, or records the sensitive data event before it leaves the approved path.

  7. 07
    Generative AI application security

    A test large language model (LLM) application event records prompt, application programming interface (API), model, retrieval, or tool interaction context.

  8. 08
    Generative AI application security

    A prompt-injection or unsafe-output test is detected, blocked, or flagged by the guardrail or large language model (LLM) firewall.

Detailed security-requirement research18 evaluation items · supporting evidence and open research are shown separatelyExpand
Security requirementPublic supportRelated frameworksWhat to verify
AI-feature discovery in business applications

Inventory software as a service (SaaS) applications that embed AI features, expose enterprise data to AI capabilities, or create AI-driven data movement.

No supporting claim found
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A software as a service (SaaS) app with an embedded AI feature appears in the software as a service (SaaS) AI inventory with app, provider, and feature context.

Browser and business-application controls

Apply session-level controls in browser and software as a service (SaaS) workflows, including uploads, downloads, copy/paste, sharing, and identity-aware access decisions.

No supporting claim found
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A session-level policy controls upload, download, copy, paste, sharing, or form submission in a browser or software as a service (SaaS) workflow.

Generative AI application security

Protect enterprise-built large language model (LLM) applications, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, prompts, application programming interfaces (APIs), model calls, tools, and production runtime behavior.

Strong public support
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A test large language model (LLM) application event records prompt, application programming interface (API), model, retrieval, or tool interaction context.

AI governance, risk, and compliance

Inventory AI systems and owners, translate policy and regulatory obligations into governed workflows, assess risk, manage approvals and exceptions, and retain audit evidence across the AI lifecycle.

No supporting claim found
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A test AI system is registered with owner, intended use, risk tier, lifecycle state, and applicable obligations.

AI assurance and adversarial testing

Test models, applications, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, and agents before release and continuously thereafter using adversarial probes, evaluation suites, attack simulation, and security release gates.

No supporting claim found
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A controlled test campaign exercises an AI model, application, or agent against named AI attack classes.

AI model and supply-chain security

Discover, inventory, scan, validate, and monitor models, datasets, model artifacts, registries, dependencies, and AI development assets for tampering, unsafe serialization, provenance gaps, or malicious content.

No supporting claim found
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A test model or AI artifact appears in inventory with origin, version, hash or provenance, and deployment context.

AI gateway, tool-connection, and runtime controls

Mediate model, agent, tool, application programming interface (API), connector, and Model Context Protocol (MCP) traffic through an enforcement point that applies identity-aware policy, content controls, routing, rate limits, and auditable allow or deny decisions.

Strong public support
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A model, agent, tool, or Model Context Protocol (MCP) request passes through a named policy enforcement point.

Non-human identity and service-account security

Inventory, least privilege, credential hygiene, monitoring, and lifecycle management for non-human identities, workloads, service accounts, application programming interface (API) keys, and machine credentials.

Limited public support
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A test service account, agent identity, or non-human identity appears in inventory with owner and privileges.

AI agent identity and permissions

Register AI agents as accountable identities, bind them to owners and delegating users, authorize task- and tool-level access, issue short-lived credentials, review access, and revoke or suspend agent authority.

Strong public support
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A test agent is registered with a unique identity, accountable owner, purpose, and permitted resources.

AI coding-agent and workstation security

Discover and govern AI coding agents, integrated development environment (IDE) assistants, command-line agents, skills, hooks, extensions, Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools, filesystem access, commands, network activity, secrets, and software-supply-chain actions on developer workstations and build environments.

Limited public support
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

A test coding agent and its skills, hooks, extensions, or Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools appear in an attributable inventory.

Licensing model

Publicly discoverable commercial model such as per user, per seat, per app, per token, per integration, or enterprise platform license.

No supporting claim found
Commercial MetadataCSA AI Controls Matrix

The vendor can map the sourced commercial model to per-user, per-seat, per-app, per-token, per-integration, or platform packaging.

Public sources

Vendor statements and quoted evidence

Showing the first 6 of 19 source records. Open additional records only when needed.

Open all vendor evidence →
Unapproved AI use discoveryNo supporting claim found

Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for workforce discovery of unmanaged AI tools, accounts, users, and usage.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
AI-feature discovery in business applicationsNo supporting claim found

Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI-feature discovery across the enterprise business-application environment.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Approved AI usage monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims real-time AI-tool traffic visibility and audit logging of user, agent, tool, application, and application programming interface (API) behavior.

Real-time visibility into AI-tool traffic with full audit logging
Controls for unapproved AI useSource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Cequence claims behavioral boundaries and inline policy that prevent agent overreach.

prevent agent overreach
Sensitive-data protection for generative AISource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims data loss prevention (DLP) scanning, monitoring, redaction, and blocking across AI-agent requests and Model Context Protocol (MCP) responses.

Apply DLP scanning to AI agent requests and MCP server responses
Browser and business-application controlsNo supporting claim found

Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for session-level browser or software as a service (SaaS) controls for employee AI use.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Show 13 additional evidence records
Generative AI application securitySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims real-time guardrails that block prompt injection and business-logic abuse.

block prompt injections and business logic abuse
AI governance, risk, and complianceNo supporting claim found

Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
AI assurance and adversarial testingNo supporting claim found

Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI-specific adversarial testing and release assurance.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
AI model and supply-chain securityNo supporting claim found

Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for model and AI-artifact supply-chain inspection.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
AI gateway, tool-connection, and runtime controlsSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims inline policy enforcement for every tool call across a full agent session.

enforces policy inline in the request path
Action-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims detailed runtime tracking of user, agent, tool, application, and application programming interface (API)-call behavior.

detailed tracking of user, agent, and tool behavior
Agent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims authentication and inline authorization of agent-to-tool and agent-to-application programming interface (API) handoffs.

full session, on every tool call
Non-human identity and service-account securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Cequence claims identity-based agent access with built-in token lifecycle management.

Built-in token lifecycle management
AI agent identity and permissionsSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims agent authentication followed by verification of every action and tool-scoped Agent Persona permissions.

AI Gateway authenticates agents and then verifies every action taken.
AI coding-agent and workstation securitySource checkedRelated public context only

Cequence claims a governed application programming interface (API) registry for code-writing agents that build against application programming interface (API) specifications.

Code-writing agents build against API specs.
AI cost and usage controlsNo supporting claim found

Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI usage attribution, budgeting, anomaly detection, and cost controls.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Licensing modelNo supporting claim found

Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for a public per-user, per-app, usage-based, or enterprise-platform commercial model.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Approved AI platform contextSource checkedRelated public context only

Cequence positions AI Gateway as an external proxy and policy layer for Model Context Protocol (MCP) and direct application programming interface (API) calls from agents.

Proxy MCP tool calls