Business-application configuration securityAdditional if: Governance includes AI inside business apps · AI features and approved AI activity inside business applications must be inventoried for governance.AI asset and configuration securityDirectly addresses · Discover approved, unmanaged, and action-taking AI systems along with model and software artifacts that require governance.
Vendor research
Reco
Review what this vendor says publicly, the security topics those statements may support, what remains unverified, and factual company context. This is not an assessment of product effectiveness or fit.
Use-case context
How this vendor relates to the selected use case
Related research availableBack to use case →
These links show approaches associated with this vendor. The relationship label describes how the approach maps to the use case—not product effectiveness, complete requirement coverage, or fit.
Company scale
Growth stage?
Growth stageA provider with at least $25M in known funding or at least 51 employees that has not reached the scaled threshold.This is a company-scale signal, not a product-quality rating.
?
Growth stageA provider with at least $25M in known funding or at least 51 employees that has not reached the scaled threshold.This is a company-scale signal, not a product-quality rating.A descriptive band derived from retained public revenue, workforce, ownership, or funding signals.
Company scale is separate from product features, effectiveness, and suitability.
- $85M known funding
- 51-200 employees
- Founded 2020
- Private-company revenue and profitability not sourced
Company context
Private, VC-backed
Reco reported 400% ARR growth in 2025 before the 2026 Series B
Research coverageCounts describe available public research, not product quality.View details
- Vendor statements
- 19 records
- Source-checked records
- 14
- Evaluation requirements
- 19 in this research model
- Unresolved requirements
- 4
Company intelligence
Who is behind the product
Company facts provide evaluation context. Each signal is kept separate because tenure, workforce, funding, and hiring answer different questions.
Founded2020
HeadquartersNew York, New York
OwnershipPrivate, VC-backed
Employees51-200
Capital and scaleIndependent company
Reco
- Known funding
- $85M
- Operating scale
- Reco reported 400% ARR growth in 2025 before the 2026 Series B
- Backing context
- $30M Series B led by Zeev Ventures; total funding reported at $85M
Series B · $30M · 2026-02-10
Named investors
Zeev Ventures · Insight Partners · boldstart ventures · Angular Ventures · Workday Ventures · TIAA Ventures · S Ventures · Quadrille Capital
Founders and leadership3 people listed
- Ofer KleinCurrent role listed
Co-Founder & CEO
- Gal NakashCurrent role listed
Co-Founder & CPO
- Dr. Tal ShapiraCurrent role listed
Co-Founder & CTO
Operating signalsRead each signal separately
There is no combined company rating. The company-scale label uses stated size thresholds; product features and effectiveness require separate evidence.
- Company tenure
- 2020
- Workforce scale
- 51-200
- Hiring activity
- Not displayed
A current count requires a retained, clickable source URL.
Core company facts have supporting public sources.
Company sources and research limits4 linked public sources
Only company facts supported by retained public sources are shown. Missing values remain unknown, and company scale does not establish product effectiveness.
Company sourceReco Series B announcementReco announced a $30M Series B led by Zeev Ventures, bringing total funding to $85M.Company sourceBusiness Insider profileBusiness Insider reported Reco was founded in 2020 and had raised prior funding from Insight, Zeev, boldstart, Angular, and Redseed.Company information sourceReco company pageSupports the company facts shown in this profile.Company information sourceReco LinkedIn company profileSupports the company facts shown in this profile.
Solution areas
These areas describe how the vendor approaches enterprise AI security. They do not establish product quality or fit.
Buyer context
- Relevant where AI risk is showing up through software as a service (SaaS) and identity posture rather than only large language model (LLM) runtime.
- Buyer diligence should compare Reco against software as a service (SaaS) security posture management and identity security incumbents.
Related frameworks
Where public vendor statements relate to framework requirements
11 related frameworks · expand when needed
Related frameworks
Where public vendor statements relate to framework requirements
These links show related requirements for further review. They do not establish framework compliance or control implementation. Open the full framework crosswalk →
Current referenceCIS Critical Security Controls
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 11
- References
- 58
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 14
- References
- 71
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 12
- References
- 35
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 12
- References
- 71
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 13
- References
- 39
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 12
- References
- 39
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 12
- References
- 31
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 11
- References
- 27
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 13
- References
- 31
- Requirements with public support
- 14
- Related requirements
- 13
- References
- 25
- Requirements with public support
- 3
- Related requirements
- 3
- References
- 3
Evaluation questions
What to verify beyond public claims
These questions come from security requirements with some public support. Use them as starting points for demonstrations, documentation review, customer references, or a buyer-observed pilot.
- 01Unapproved AI use discovery
An unmanaged AI app used by a test user appears in discovery inventory with user, app or domain, and timestamp.
- 02Unapproved AI use discovery
The test user's AI usage activity can be filtered or exported with AI-specific context.
- 03AI-feature discovery in business applications
A software as a service (SaaS) app with an embedded AI feature appears in the software as a service (SaaS) AI inventory with app, provider, and feature context.
- 04AI-feature discovery in business applications
The inventory shows which users, data classes, integrations, or providers are associated with the AI-enabled software as a service (SaaS) app.
- 05Approved AI usage monitoring
Approved AI workspace activity appears with user, workspace or tenant, model or provider, and timestamp.
- 06Approved AI usage monitoring
Prompt, model, or admin activity can be exported or correlated for the selected approved AI platform.
- 07Controls for unapproved AI use
A policy blocks, coaches, redirects, or contains a test interaction with an unapproved AI destination.
- 08Controls for unapproved AI use
The control event records policy reason, user, destination, action, and timestamp.
Detailed security-requirement research18 evaluation items · supporting evidence and open research are shown separatelyExpand
Security requirementPublic supportRelated frameworksWhat to verify
Unapproved AI use discovery
Strong public supportDiscover and monitor workforce AI tools, accounts, prompts, domains, models, users, and usage outside approved controls.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
An unmanaged AI app used by a test user appears in discovery inventory with user, app or domain, and timestamp.
AI-feature discovery in business applications
Strong public supportInventory software as a service (SaaS) applications that embed AI features, expose enterprise data to AI capabilities, or create AI-driven data movement.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A software as a service (SaaS) app with an embedded AI feature appears in the software as a service (SaaS) AI inventory with app, provider, and feature context.
Approved AI usage monitoring
Strong public supportMonitor approved AI workspaces, tenants, gateways, and model platforms such as ChatGPT Enterprise, Claude Enterprise, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Vertex AI, Elvex, or internal AI gateways.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
Approved AI workspace activity appears with user, workspace or tenant, model or provider, and timestamp.
Controls for unapproved AI use
Strong public supportBlock, coach, redirect, or contain non-approved AI use and policy-violating AI interactions.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A policy blocks, coaches, redirects, or contains a test interaction with an unapproved AI destination.
Sensitive-data protection for generative AI
Limited public supportDetect, classify, redact, or block sensitive data in prompts, responses, files, retrieval, memory, and AI-connected workflows.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
Sensitive prompt, response, or file test data is detected and classified during an AI interaction.
Browser and business-application controls
Strong public supportApply session-level controls in browser and software as a service (SaaS) workflows, including uploads, downloads, copy/paste, sharing, and identity-aware access decisions.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A session-level policy controls upload, download, copy, paste, sharing, or form submission in a browser or software as a service (SaaS) workflow.
Generative AI application security
No supporting claim foundProtect enterprise-built large language model (LLM) applications, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, prompts, application programming interfaces (APIs), model calls, tools, and production runtime behavior.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A test large language model (LLM) application event records prompt, application programming interface (API), model, retrieval, or tool interaction context.
AI governance, risk, and compliance
Strong public supportInventory AI systems and owners, translate policy and regulatory obligations into governed workflows, assess risk, manage approvals and exceptions, and retain audit evidence across the AI lifecycle.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A test AI system is registered with owner, intended use, risk tier, lifecycle state, and applicable obligations.
AI assurance and adversarial testing
No supporting claim foundTest models, applications, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, and agents before release and continuously thereafter using adversarial probes, evaluation suites, attack simulation, and security release gates.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A controlled test campaign exercises an AI model, application, or agent against named AI attack classes.
AI model and supply-chain security
Limited public supportDiscover, inventory, scan, validate, and monitor models, datasets, model artifacts, registries, dependencies, and AI development assets for tampering, unsafe serialization, provenance gaps, or malicious content.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A test model or AI artifact appears in inventory with origin, version, hash or provenance, and deployment context.
AI gateway, tool-connection, and runtime controls
Limited public supportMediate model, agent, tool, application programming interface (API), connector, and Model Context Protocol (MCP) traffic through an enforcement point that applies identity-aware policy, content controls, routing, rate limits, and auditable allow or deny decisions.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A model, agent, tool, or Model Context Protocol (MCP) request passes through a named policy enforcement point.
Action-taking agent monitoring
Strong public supportObserve and govern agent plans, memory, tool calls, delegated tasks, autonomy, runtime decisions, and outcomes.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A test agent run captures plan, steps, tool calls, outcome, and timestamps.
Agent-to-agent communication security
Limited public supportAuthorize, log, and control agent-to-agent, agent-to-tool, Model Context Protocol (MCP), connector, and tool-chain handoffs.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
An agent, tool, connector, or Model Context Protocol (MCP) handoff logs source identity, destination, and authorization decision.
Non-human identity and service-account security
Limited public supportInventory, least privilege, credential hygiene, monitoring, and lifecycle management for non-human identities, workloads, service accounts, application programming interface (API) keys, and machine credentials.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A test service account, agent identity, or non-human identity appears in inventory with owner and privileges.
AI agent identity and permissions
Limited public supportRegister AI agents as accountable identities, bind them to owners and delegating users, authorize task- and tool-level access, issue short-lived credentials, review access, and revoke or suspend agent authority.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A test agent is registered with a unique identity, accountable owner, purpose, and permitted resources.
AI coding-agent and workstation security
Limited public supportDiscover and govern AI coding agents, integrated development environment (IDE) assistants, command-line agents, skills, hooks, extensions, Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools, filesystem access, commands, network activity, secrets, and software-supply-chain actions on developer workstations and build environments.
NIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0CIS Critical Security ControlsISO/IEC 42001OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape
A test coding agent and its skills, hooks, extensions, or Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools appear in an attributable inventory.
AI cost and usage controls
No supporting claim foundVisibility, attribution, budgeting, rate limiting, anomaly detection, and optimization for AI usage and spend across models, agents, workflows, and owners.
Commercial MetadataNIST AI RMF PlaybookNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0ISO/IEC 42001OWASP Agentic AI Security Solutions Landscape
A controlled AI usage event is attributed to user, team, model, workflow, or owner with cost or token metrics.
Licensing model
No supporting claim foundPublicly discoverable commercial model such as per user, per seat, per app, per token, per integration, or enterprise platform license.
The vendor can map the sourced commercial model to per-user, per-seat, per-app, per-token, per-integration, or platform packaging.
Public sources
Vendor statements and quoted evidence
Showing the first 6 of 19 source records. Open additional records only when needed.
Reco claims continuous inventory, ownership and permission mapping, policy enforcement, audit visibility, posture assessment, and governance for approved and shadow AI agents across software as a service (SaaS) environments.
The platform automatically inventories every AI agent operating across your connected SaaS applications.
Reco AI agent and Model Context Protocol (MCP) security materials reviewed did not provide a public product claim for automated adversarial testing, repeatable attack suites, model or agent red teaming, or release-gate evaluation.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Reco claims discovery and mapping of Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, tools, external integrations, OAuth grants, application programming interface (API) connections, data paths, scopes, and unauthorized trust relationships across AI agents and software as a service (SaaS) applications.
Reco makes them visible, showing exactly which systems are connected, what data flows between them, and where permission breakdowns exist.
Reco claims real-time observability, policy enforcement, misuse and prompt-injection alerting, permission control, and restriction or blocking of AI agents and Model Context Protocol (MCP) paths across connected software as a service (SaaS) environments.
Reco addresses these MCP security challenges through a combination of real-time observability, policy enforcement, and automated control over permissions and tool behavior.
Reco claims mapping of each AI agent to authorizing users, connected applications, OAuth grants, application programming interface (API) identities, permissions, data access, ownership, and policy status with least-privilege controls.
For each agent, Reco maps which SaaS applications it connects to, what permissions it holds, who authorized it, and what data it can access.
Reco claims discovery of coding agents and their Model Context Protocol (MCP), software as a service (SaaS), repository, OAuth, permission, identity, and data relationships, including Cursor connections to GitHub and other enterprise applications.
An MCP server created a connection between Slack and Cursor, producing a permissions breakdown where two applications share a trust relationship.
Show 13 additional evidence records
Reco materials reviewed did not establish product-level AI cost attribution, token or spend metrics, budgets, chargeback, or cost-aware model routing.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Reco claims it automatically discovers AI agents across Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Agentforce, Make, n8n, and custom integrations.
Complete Inventory Automatically discover every agent across Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Agentforce, Make, n8n, and custom integrations.
Reco claims embedded AI in software as a service (SaaS) apps, generative AI tools, and copilots is expanding faster than teams can track and connects to enterprise data.
Embedded AI in your SaaS apps, GenAI tools, and copilots is expanding faster than your team can track. Every new feature connects to your data.
Reco claims AI security posture visibility across approved AI agents, software as a service (SaaS) applications, users, permissions, and data access.
Visibility and control over every agent from day one.
Reco claims teams can sanction approved agents, block unauthorized ones, and enforce least-privilege policies across the enterprise ecosystem.
Sanction approved agents, block unauthorized ones, and enforce least-privilege policies across your enterprise ecosystem.
Reco claims it identifies and mitigates data exposure risks across the agent and app ecosystem.
Identify and mitigate data exposure risks across your agent and app ecosystem.
Reco claims it maps every agent in the environment to its owner, permissions, and risk with lineage and context.
Know exactly what every agent in your environment can access, who owns it, and where the risk is. Before the next class of AI finds out first.
Reco claims AI-agent risk reduction through mapping cross-app connections, permissions, and automated actions across software as a service (SaaS).
Cross-application connection mappings
Reco claims it makes agents, integrations, and non-human identities visible and maps what they can access.
Every day, your business deploys more agents, integrations, and non-human identities. Most of them operate invisibly. Reco makes them visible, maps what they can access, and tells you when they deviate from policy, before they become a liability.
Reco claims user, software as a service (SaaS), browser extension, OAuth, and connected-app governance for AI-agent security.
Detects browser extensions and unapproved integrations
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
No public claim found for this capability.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.