ASAI Security ResearchIndependent public-source research

Public reviewread only

Public-source research

Vendor evidence

Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.

Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details

Evidence records1280

Source checked863

Needs verification0

Source captured0

No supporting claim found411

Excluded from evidence6

Search evidenceResearch statusVendorSecurity requirementRelated framework

Showing 1–20 of 70 evidence records

Clear all filters

Akamai API SecurityAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

Akamai application programming interface (API) Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for authorization and control across agent, tool, Model Context Protocol (MCP), or connector handoffs.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Salt Agentic Security PlatformAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Salt claims controls that detect and address risky exposure in Model Context Protocol (MCP) and agent-to-agent (A2A) environments.

the riskiest exposures in MCP and A2A environments

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Imperva AI Application SecurityAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

Imperva AI Application Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for authorization and control across agent, tool, Model Context Protocol (MCP), or connector handoffs.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Kong AI GatewayAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Kong claims control and observation of agent-to-agent communication over agent-to-agent (A2A).

Control and observe agent-to-agent communication over the A2A protocol

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Speakeasy AI Control PlaneAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Speakeasy claims distributed traces across agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, and downstream application programming interfaces (APIs).

Follow a tool call across agents, MCP servers, and downstream APIs

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Harness AI Security / TraceableAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

Harness AI Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for authorization and control across agent, tool, Model Context Protocol (MCP), or connector handoffs.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Wallarm AI Control PlatformAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Wallarm claims access and schema controls for agent-to-Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool handoffs.

ensure tool calls conform to the published schema

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Cequence AI GatewayAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims authentication and inline authorization of agent-to-tool and agent-to-application programming interface (API) handoffs.

full session, on every tool call

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Upwind AI SecurityAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

Upwind materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for trust or policy enforcement between agents.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Proofpoint AI Security / AcuvityAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

Proofpoint materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for trust or policy enforcement between agents.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Veeam / Securiti AIAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

Securiti AI materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for trust or policy enforcement between agents.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Snyk EvoAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

Snyk Evo materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for trust or policy enforcement between agents.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

ModelOpAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

ModelOp materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for trust or policy enforcement between agents.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

LatticeFlow AIAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

LatticeFlow AI materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for trust or policy enforcement between agents.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

RunlayerAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

Runlayer materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for trust or policy enforcement between agents.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

KeycardAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Keycard claims authentication for agent-to-agent delegation while preserving user identity.

Announcing Keycard for Multi-Agent Apps

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

AWS Bedrock native AI securityAgent-to-agent communication securityNo supporting claim found

AWS Bedrock native-control materials reviewed did not provide a public Model Context Protocol (MCP), agent-to-agent (A2A), or agent-to-agent communication security claim.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Microsoft native AI security beyond Purview DSPMAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Microsoft claims Entra Agent ID supports OAuth 2.0, Model Context Protocol (MCP), and agent-to-agent (A2A) for authentication and agent-to-agent communication.

supports standard protocols such as OAuth 2.0, MCP, and A2A for authentication and agent-to-agent communication.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Zscaler AI SecurityAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Zscaler claims AI Broker secures agentic communications through Model Context Protocol (MCP) and agent-to-agent (A2A) brokers with fine-grained access policies.

Secure agentic communications through MCP and A2A brokers and enforce fine-grained access policies across every enterprise AI agent.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape

Palo Alto Networks Prisma AIRSAgent-to-agent communication securitySource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Palo Alto Networks says Portkey provides an AI Gateway for Prisma AIRS that can monitor, route, and secure AI transactions and supports agent-to-agent communication.

monitor, route, and secure every AI transaction across the enterprise.

Related framework references (5)

NIST AI RMF Playbook NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 CIS Critical Security Controls ISO/IEC 42001 OWASP GenAI Security Solutions Landscape