ASAI Security ResearchIndependent public-source research
Public reviewread only

Public-source research

Vendor evidence

Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.

Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details
Evidence records1280
Source checked863
Needs verification0
Source captured0
No supporting claim found411
Excluded from evidence6

Showing 1–20 of 71 evidence records

Clear all filters
Akamai API SecurityAction-taking agent monitoringNo supporting claim found

Akamai application programming interface (API) Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for runtime visibility into agent decisions, actions, tools, and outcomes.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Salt Agentic Security PlatformAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Salt claims visibility into agent-driven actions and maps them to application programming interfaces (APIs), methods, and workflows.

visibility into every agent-driven action
Imperva AI Application SecurityAction-taking agent monitoringNo supporting claim found

Imperva AI Application Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for runtime visibility into agent decisions, actions, tools, and outcomes.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Kong AI GatewayAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Kong claims unified observation of large language model (LLM) calls, Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool invocations, and agent-to-agent (A2A) communication.

observe LLM calls, MCP tool invocations, and A2A communication
Speakeasy AI Control PlaneAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Speakeasy claims real-time logs and traces for Model Context Protocol (MCP) requests and agent tool calls.

Real-time logs and traces for every MCP request
Harness AI Security / TraceableAction-taking agent monitoringNo supporting claim found

Harness AI Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for runtime visibility into agent decisions, actions, tools, and outcomes.

No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Cequence AI GatewayAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Cequence claims detailed runtime tracking of user, agent, tool, application, and application programming interface (API)-call behavior.

detailed tracking of user, agent, and tool behavior
Upwind AI SecurityAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Upwind claims end-to-end runtime observation of agent prompts, decisions, tool invocations, file actions, application programming interface (API) calls, and system changes.

Observation of tool invocation and agent function calls
Proofpoint AI Security / AcuvityAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Proofpoint claims runtime observability, anomaly detection, and transaction reconstruction across multi-step agent workflows.

runtime observability across multi-step workflows
Veeam / Securiti AIAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Veeam and Securiti claim Agent Commander can discover shadow agents and provide visibility into data-use risk.

Bring unsanctioned agents under governance with visibility into data use risk.
LatticeFlow AIAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

LatticeFlow AI claims evaluation of agent workflows, security controls, tool permissions, reliability, compliance risk, and multi-step behavior.

assessing security controls, tool access permissions, reliability, and compliance risk across multi-step agent behaviors
RunlayerAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Runlayer claims visibility, policy, and audit across agent sessions, MCPs, skills, plugins, memory, triggers, and scoped permissions.

full visibility into every agent session
KeycardAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Keycard claims a real-time event stream of agent actions, tool calls, policy decisions, and attributed audit events.

A real-time event stream of every agent action, tool call, and policy decision.
AWS Bedrock native AI securityAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

AWS claims Bedrock AgentCore includes tracing, debugging, and evaluation capabilities for agent performance.

continuously optimize agent performance with tracing, debugging, and evaluation capabilities built in.
Google Cloud native AI securityAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedLimited public support for this requirement

Google claims Model Armor can intercept prompts and responses for Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform traffic.

Model Armor intercepts prompts before they reach Gemini models, and intercepts responses before your application receives them.
Microsoft native AI security beyond Purview DSPMAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Microsoft claims Foundry tracing captures agent inputs, outputs, tool usage, retries, latencies, and costs during an agent run.

It captures key details during an agent run, such as inputs, outputs, tool usage, retries, latencies, and costs.
Zscaler AI SecurityAction-taking agent monitoringSource checkedStrong public support for this requirement

Zscaler claims AI Access Graph provides real-time visibility into how AI agents use data and identities.

Get real-time visibility into how AI agents use data and identities, reducing unnecessary access and tracking data lineage across every channel.