Akamai application programming interface (API) Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for blocking, coaching, redirecting, or containing unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Public-source research
Vendor evidence
Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.
Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details
Evidence records1280
Source checked863
Needs verification0
Source captured0
No supporting claim found411
Excluded from evidence6
Showing 1–20 of 69 evidence records
Clear all filtersSalt Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for blocking, coaching, redirecting, or containing unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Imperva AI Application Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for blocking, coaching, redirecting, or containing unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Kong AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for blocking, coaching, redirecting, or containing unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Speakeasy claims blocking or sanctioning of unapproved AI-tool usage.
Block or sanction unapproved usage.
Harness AI Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for blocking, coaching, redirecting, or containing unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Wallarm AI Control Platform materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for blocking, coaching, redirecting, or containing unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Cequence claims behavioral boundaries and inline policy that prevent agent overreach.
prevent agent overreach
Upwind materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for policy enforcement over unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Proofpoint claims context-aware policy enforcement over employee AI interactions at runtime.
enforces context-aware policies
Securiti claims controls over enterprise use of data and AI.
Establish controls on use of data and AI.
Snyk Evo materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for policy enforcement over unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
ModelOp materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for policy enforcement over unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
LatticeFlow AI materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for policy enforcement over unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Runlayer claims policy over what users and agents may access under identity, budget, OAuth grant, and runtime conditions.
Set what users and agents can access, under which identity, budget, OAuth grant, and runtime conditions.
Keycard materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for policy enforcement over unapproved AI use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Google claims Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform can call Model Armor to inspect or block traffic that violates defined policies.
Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform calls the Model Armor service, which inspects or blocks traffic that violates your defined policies
Microsoft Foundry and Agent ID native-control materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for blocking arbitrary unapproved employee AI app use.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Zscaler claims AI Access Security can warn, block, isolate, and restrict copy-paste actions within AI applications.
Use flexible policies to warn, block, or enforce browser isolation, giving you full control over copy-paste actions within AI applications.
Palo Alto Networks claims AI Access Security can classify generative AI apps by sanction status and enforce access, upload, and download controls.
Classify apps as sanctioned, tolerated or unsanctioned, and implement robust access controls.