Public-source research
Vendor evidence
Review what vendors say publicly, the exact quoted source text, the security requirement each statement may support, and what still needs verification.
Research library coverageCounts describe the research workflow, not vendor quality or product effectiveness.View details
Evidence records1280
Source checked863
Needs verification0
Source captured0
No supporting claim found411
Excluded from evidence6
Akamai application programming interface (API) Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Salt Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Imperva AI Application Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Kong AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Speakeasy AI Control Plane materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Harness AI Security materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Wallarm AI Control Platform materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Cequence AI Gateway materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for AI inventory, risk, approval, exception, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Upwind claims model version, lineage, audit-trail, and posture controls for cloud AI services.
maintain lineage, and enforce audit trails
Related framework references (5)
Proofpoint claims governance, policy, audit evidence, and runtime context for enterprise AI usage and agent behavior.
govern every interaction
Related framework references (5)
Securiti claims assessments and automated compliance checks mapped to NIST AI RMF, the EU AI Act, and more than twenty regulations.
Conduct assessments to comply with standards such as NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, and more than twenty other regulations.
Related framework references (5)
Snyk Evo claims enforceable AI policy across development and CI/CD workflows.
Turn AI governance from documentation into enforceable policy across development and CI/CD.
Related framework references (5)
ModelOp claims end-to-end lifecycle governance with use-case intake, risk tiering, controls, approvals, evidence, monitoring, and attestations.
ModelOp automates end-to-end AI lifecycle management and governance
Related framework references (5)
LatticeFlow AI claims executable technical controls, continuous risk tracking, framework mappings, and audit-ready evidence.
implement executable technical controls that track AI risk continuously
Related framework references (5)
Runlayer materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for enterprise AI governance, risk, approval, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Keycard materials reviewed did not provide a public claim for enterprise AI governance, risk, approval, and compliance workflows.
No quoted source text is recorded for this claim.
Related framework references (5)
Palo Alto Networks claims centralized visibility and governance over agents, models, and interactions, including ownership, permissions, and least-privileged access.
Move from pilots to production with full visibility and governance over every agent, model and interaction.
Related framework references (5)
Cisco claims standards-aligned findings, risk scoring, policy-driven gating, and compliance support across model, agent, and Model Context Protocol (MCP) workflows.
Findings and protections map to leading frameworks, including MITRE ATLAS, OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, and NIST AI-RMF
Related framework references (5)
Microsoft claims Agent 365 provides a centralized control plane to discover, manage, govern, and secure Microsoft and third-party AI agents.
Microsoft Agent 365 is a Microsoft 365 service that provides a centralized control plane for AI agents.
Related framework references (5)
CrowdStrike claims unified AI visibility, governance, policy enforcement, and compliance logging across users, prompts, models, agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, endpoints, applications, gateways, and cloud environments.
AIDR maps relationships between users, prompts, models, agents, and MCP servers, and captures runtime logs for compliance.
Related framework references (5)